Alan See

A recent article in the Wall Street Journal (Recovery Losses Momentum) stated that consumers have seen little growth in their wallets and remain skittish about the economy’s prospects.  Of course, if you own a business that depends on people having jobs and disposable income you didn’t need research from the U.S. Commerce Department to tell you that consumer spending is sluggish.  Economists are currently cutting forecasts for the second half, and your calls and foot traffic are already down.  So, what’s your plan?  Take more costs out of the business?  My guess is that you’ve already cut expenses to the bone.  But hold the presses! Do you really need a marketing recovery plan?  After all, Business Week reported (The New Abnormal) that while Americans are broke and depressed they are still swilling $3 lattes and waiting in line for iPhones.  Are you from Apple or Starbucks?  I’m not either; so here are some quick tips to consider in our “unusually uncertain” economy.

1. Focus on the consumer.
a. Translation: Make sure you address competitive weaknesses within the four stages of the consumer purchasing process lifecycle, including: Awareness, Information Search, Evaluation, and Purchase / After-Sale Service.  In addition, you may need to think smaller by breaking large marketing initiatives into several highly targeted micro campaigns based on continuous selection of the best (most profitable) of the best (ready-to-buy).

2. You will not get a do-over, mulligan or practice shot.
a. Translation: Do your P&L homework upfront and structure your best offer immediately. Don’t hold back; consumers with cash and a willingness to spend it are in short supply right now.

3. Don’t wait until there is a problem to contact or follow up with customers.
a. Translation: Monitor trigger events (contract dates, service calls, etc) closely and nurture two-way relationship building conversations. For example, my cell phone contract expired back in February and I still have not been contacted.  When you do follow up make sure you have something valuable or significant to relate.  By the way, a call merely to say you “just wanted to touch base” is not value-add.

4. Keep asking, listening, analyzing and improving.
a. Translation: Keep asking for and listening to your customer’s feedback.  And make sure you are leveraging and engaging your entire organization as it relates to that feedback.  Social media platforms are an excellent channel to help you both listen and engage in conversation.

There is a story that is told of Henry Ford about a breakdown in his assembly line that no one on his staff could fix.  As the story goes, his production lines were down for hours; hours turned into days, and Henry was frustrated.  In desperation he called an electrical engineer friend whom he trusted to come to his plant, diagnose, and repair the problem.  His friend promptly arrived and after spending about ten minutes the Ford lines were up and running.  A most grateful Henry Ford thanked him and told his friend to invoice the Ford Company for the repairs.  A few days later Henry Ford received an invoice from his friend in the amount of $10,000.  Flabbergasted, Henry called his friend on the telephone and protested, “You only tinkered around for ten minutes!  Ten-thousand dollars?!”  His friend agreed that he would re-invoice the repairs.  A few days later Henry Ford received a modified invoice:

Tinkering - $10

Knowing where to Tinker - $9,990

Knowing where to Twitter …

There is a structured path to becoming an electrical engineer.  And based on the outcome of the story, Henry’s friend was either very lucky - or clearly knew what he was doing.  The road to becoming a social media marketing expert isn’t as clear.  In fact, in today’s environment it’s often the subject line of marketing agency jokes.  Still, if you believe there is a breakdown in your strategic marketing plan related to social media here are a few questions to consider before calling in an expert:

1.     Are my customers, prospects or other constituents on social media?  That may sound like a ridiculous question to ask first; but why did you get into social media?  Are you sure you need social media platforms?

2.     Can you describe the elements of your program that don’t seem to be working?  Again, that may come across as a silly question; but are your challenges related to strategy, technology or processes?  At the risk of some shameless self-promotion you might consider taking the Berry Network Social-Ready Assessment in order to establish a baseline measurement on those key competencies areas.

3.    What does the expert’s reputation appear to be in the social media space?  Do I trust them?  Are they practicing what they preach, and if so, are they any good?  Engaging your brand in social media is easier said than done.  So you may need to make room in your budget for paid council.

I’m fortunate to be able to reflect on the role of marketing as both a CMO and educator. In my role as educator my student’s first assignment is always a short interpretive paper in which I ask for their personal definition of marketing; as well as their perspective on marketing’s importance in helping organizations achieve success. Over the years, I’ve discovered that these papers provide a glimpse into the mindset of individuals who are generally not focused on core marketing activities or marketing’s role in relation to broader business strategies.
Demographically, the class typically represents a diverse cross-section. One thing they do have in common; they are full-time working adults who are not shy when sharing their real-world working experiences with the class. More often than not, their original narratives will jump into examples of product-focused mass advertising or publicity activities. The use of sexy and manipulative promotional tactics for selling the audience on why they should want the product is representative of marketing’s tactical purpose in their initial points of view. In fact, for classes that start in January you can bet on at least one reference to a Super Bowl commercial. However; I can tell straight away who is reading ahead in the syllabus, or working for a company that views marketing strategically because those efforts reflect the leadership role that marketing plays as a core business strategy.

An Effective Marketing Strategy

An effective marketing strategy involves a process of narrowing down to a specific target market and marketing mix that represents an opportunity the company wants to compete for based on their business’s mission and vision. Because most company’s resources are limited, and there are usually multiple strategies possible, the ability to consistently zero in on the best market with the best marketing mix will delight both management and the market. Does the previous statement sound familiar? If not, maybe you’ll recognize it in the form of the “right…” phrase that is often found in whitepapers. It’s worded as follows; companies that first focus on the customer’s needs, and then satisfy those needs by delivering “the right product through the right channel at the right price at the right time” will build customer loyalty and maximize shareholder value.
Imagine that an organization fully understands the needs and desires of its target market, and that the marketing mix is combined in a way that fully supports the overall business strategy. In other words, manufacturing, product management, product marketing, advertising & public relations, sales, service, finance and logistics have all pull together to provide perfect alignment. Was that hard to imagine? The perspective painted by my student’s suggests that most organizations are still highly matrixed environments, and that suggests overall business strategies are loosely knit at best. Don’t get me wrong, matrixes are not going to go away. Particularly in large organizations where you need specialists because the scope of the whole marketing job is just too big for one person. Yet, the fact remains that alignment breakdowns between these functional areas continues to put business strategies at risk.

A Written Marketing Plan

How can marketing take a leadership position to help reduce risk and ensure strategic alignment? How about another dashboard or scorecard? After all, a relationship with customers is what capitalism is built on, and the great thing about capitalism is that it keeps score. In fact, at this point technology vendors might be tempted to insert the need for a heavy dose of their specific applications to better manage reporting or improve the ability to target customers and predict their behavior. I can’t argue that specific technology might not help any given situation; however, technology alone won’t turn the product-focused dotted-line matrix challenge into a solid-line customer-focused marketing plan.
A simple but often overlooked discipline to ensure that marketing is facilitating strategic alignment and that the marketing mix is focused on the desired customer experience is to use a written marketing plan for each marketing strategy developed. There is value to organizing, documenting and writing down a marketing plan. The very process of bringing functional areas together to ask and answer the questions posed in a comprehensive marketing plan will create a road map to guide your total marketing efforts, and help bring strategic alignment.
My student’s final assignment is a team-based project that involves the design, documentation and presentation of a complete marketing plan based on the launch of a new product. The presentations always generate lively class discussion as each team talks about their target market and the marketing mix that will be crafted to satisfy the researched needs. Although it takes me several days to grade, it’s encouraging to read their new and expanded perspectives, and I can assure you that the strategic transformation of the marketing function as brought to life in their documented plan would warm any CMO’s heart.

My post “Using Marketing Booth Babes” sparked some lively discussion. The original post asked marketer’s for their opinion on the practice of using booth babes (scantily clad women … or men) to attract attention to their organizations booth at conferences and trade-shows. The use of sexual tension to create a direction for a movie plot or to sell products is an age-old strategy. However, many readers agreed that using sex as a way to suggest product “sizzle” was no longer very original, and in fact could be risky if it actually alienated potential purchasers.

So what is your opinion of the practice of using “Twitter Babes” to promote and draw in page followers? I’m not talking about spam accounts that are pornographic in nature. You can hit the block function on spammers easily enough. And I’m not talking about the properties where you might actually expect to see scantily clad women; for example, individuals who follow pages selling Victoria’s Secret like brands and products probably expect to see women in lingerie. What I’m thinking about are those Twitter pages where the bio, homepage URL and even the customized background suggest a professional intention that in no way requires a string bikini woman or ripped abs man as the picture icon. The “June 2009 State of the Twittersphere” report from the folks at HubSpot lists some interesting Twitter factoids:

• 79.79% fail to provide a homepage URL
• 75.86% of users have not entered a bio in their profile
• 68.68% have not specified a location
• 54.88% have never tweeted

Why are these factoids important? Because, when people are deciding whether to follow your page they look at your recent updates, bio, URL, location and picture icon to get a sense of who you really are. In short, Twitter is an extension of your brand. For that reason you should make sure your profile details, including your picture, supports your strategic goals and objectives.

The September 2009 issue of Inc. magazine showcases the 500 fastest-growing private companies. Forty-eight advertising and marketing companies are listed and a recurring theme among those organizations is a performance-based business model. In other words, the client only pays when customers take action. Pay-for-Call, Cost-per-Action, Pay-per-Sale, Revenue-Sharing, Profit-Sharing; make no mistake, performance-based business models contain elements of risk, and are taking center-stage in our current economy.

Well, “taking center-stage” may be overstated as the need to measure marketing performance has been a hot topic for several years now. Case studies that document marketing-return-on-investment (MROI) and articles covering the short tenure of marketing leaders who do not quickly deliver measurable results are numerous. So what’s different about the current trend? Traditionally, one might view the agency business model as low risk-low reward. This means that the advertiser pays 100% for all goods and services and then owns 100% of the resulting efforts. However, I’m sure there are several agencies who would argue that they have always been held accountable for measurable results no matter how the business model is defined. I’m also sure there are advertisers who would counter with agency invoices that they felt did not reflect a low reward trade-off.

All forms of advertising pose some risk, and no agency can afford to work for free - so we can’t hope to eliminate risk or reward in advertising. However, advertisers and agencies can negotiate with one another to find business models that represent acceptable levels of risk and reward for both parties. Performance based advertising isn’t for everyone and it’s not right for every situation; but given the current economic climate it’s worth exploring.

Are you friending, linking, tweeting and blogging? Social media is driving a wave of human interaction around the world. In fact, I find myself approaching the triple 3K mark on twitter; 3,000 tweets, 3,000 followers and 3,000 connections. Those are fairly low numbers when compared to many avid twitter users; although high enough to rank in the top one percent of users, at least according to Twitter Grader . But what does it all mean? Do social media sites encourage people to concentrate on their number of connections rather than build actual relationships? Is social media best used by individuals; or will it really change the way organizations engage their customers? And what about the ROI; is the return on relationships something that can (or should) be measured?

Some marketer’s are still eager to list the reasons why they don’t believe in social media platforms.

• It’s for self-promoters or the unemployed.
• It’s for teenagers.
• It’s just over-sharing too much trivial babble.
• It doesn’t directly drive sales leads.
• I can’t control the marketing message.
• There is no measurable ROI.

While all those may be true in some cases, you’re not doing your organization any favors by dismissing the game changing power behind the new social media applications. At a high-level social media marketing is about influencing the customer experience by engaging in dialogue with the customer in order to build a trusted relationship over time. The customer experience refers to all touch points people have from the moment they are aware of a need until they have fulfilled the need or reached a certain goal. To make the social-ready transformation an organization may need to adopt a new mindset. Most transformations involve strategy, technology and processes and a social media transformation is no different in that respect.

1. Strategy: How well does your social media plan support your overall marketing strategy?

2. Technology: Do you have the technology and infrastructure to support your social media goals and objectives?

3. Processes: Do you have the operational processes in place to support your social media goals and objectives?

In the last few months we’ve noticed that many organizations tend to fall in the following broad categories as it relates to the key transformation areas above:

The Broadcaster:
The Broadcaster is typically focused on one way communications and is most comfortable in the traditional media world of mass marketing. Leveraging typical “push marketing” tools and tactics the Broadcaster pushes their product towards the audience which may or may not be aware of it. The Broadcaster largely focuses on the features of their product or service and seeks a direct response from the mass audience. Often times the Broadcaster is focused on a short-term strategy that involves a specific event or time-based campaign (Christmas deals, Back-to-School, etc).

The Listener:
The Listener tends to focus on push marketing tactics; but also considers customer feedback. The Listener may have customer listening posts established in the form of brand monitoring initiatives, although those initiatives may be fairly informal.

The Conversationalist:
The Conversationalist is more in the “pull marketing” camp. The Conversationalist is typically interested in interacting with their target market at a deeper level of engagement through tighter relevance, content and stronger brand identification. The Conversationalist is focused on the development of trust and perceived value.

The Community Builder:
The Community Builder is fully in the pull marketing camp. The Community Builder looks for ways to engage their customers and prospects in two-way conversations, and is comfortable with the concepts of user created content and co-creation. The Community Builder is focused on influencing and involving vs. educating and controlling their audience.

Building a social-ready organization is an on-going journey. And that journey as well as an organizations position on the social media continuum is determined by several factors, including; overall marketing strategy, desired customer experience, business model, and the competitive environment. Social media isn’t going away so you need to set a course that’s right for your corporate goals and objectives.

June sales are leaving many retailers anxious about the approaching back-to-school shopping season. Consumers continue to buy less and they are more discriminating than ever. However; many brand consultants argue that the recession has not created a pricing shift but a higher degree of awareness regarding the value of products and brands. Today’s discount shopper is clearly reluctant to spend on premium brands if the value is missing.

I recently pulled out C. Britt Beemer and Robert L. Shook’s book “It Takes a Prophet to Make a Profit … 15 Trends that are Reshaping American Business.” Published in 2001, trend #6 reads:

“Consumers Are Reluctant to Pay Full Retail Price”

Their research showed the number one reason Americans dislike paying full retail price is that they think prices are too high. Fifty-seven percent of discount shoppers expressed that opinion. In addition, they reported:

• 82 percent said they knew the item would be on sale someday.
• 82 percent also said that somebody always has it on sale.
• 79 percent said they normally wait for sales because they don’t need an item right away.
• 46 percent felt that quality has suffered.
• 34 percent said that service has declined.

It’s difficult to read consumers because they are not always consistent. But when your customers are skittish about spending it’s not hard to see that both quality and value for the dollar are important.

Grocery store’s who tried to attract customer’s by influencing the customer shopping experience via coffee bars, fancy bakeries and the availability of exotic products are going back to the basics. Major players such as Kroger, Stop & Shop, Publix and other big food chains are now refocusing efforts on the middle aisles where as much as 70% of their weekly profits are generated. In fact, many retailers are also expected to slice the assortment of products in their stores by at least 15%. According to a recent article in the Wall Street Journal (“Retailers Cut Back on Variety, Once the Spice of Marketing”) retailers are trying to cater to budget-conscious shoppers who want to simplify shopping trips and stick to familiar products.

Incremental variations on popular products can be confusing since some 47,113 new products, variations or sizes were launched last year, more than twice as many as in 1998. For example, a typical Target store has 88 kinds of Pantene shampoo, conditioner and styling products. How many hair products do you need? I don’t need any; but then again, I’m nearly bald. If your favorite grocery retailer stops carrying a specific product in the size, flavor or fragrance you prefer are you likely to defect to another store? I’m not; however, if they change my experience by closing more check-out lanes that could make a difference because I hate to wait.

The current economy is forcing changes that may impact the customer experience. What is a show-stopper for you?

At the core of all customer-focused organizations are two essential characteristics: trust and commitment. Through trust and commitment customer-focused organizations demonstrate that they are dependable, reliable and that they honor their word. With that said, my hat is off to Bill’s Jewelry Shop in downtown Grinnell, Iowa. In a recent article in The Grinnell Magazine I read that Elizabeth McJimsey Souder graduated from Grinnell College in 1988 without picking up her restrung pearl necklace from the Grinnell merchant. Shop owners Bill and Jeanne Hammen tried several times over the years to get in touch with Souder, but could not make contact. Over the next two decades Souder moved many times, while her forgotten pearls waited in Grinnell, stored away with some other pieces of unclaimed jewelry.

Souder stated … “I recall wondering about the pearls several times and shuddering at the thought that I had lost them, because they had belonged to my grandmother, I became convinced that I’d carelessly lost them somewhere along the way.”

Last year the Hammen’s were finally able to reconnect the pearls with their owner.

Souder added … “I’m not at all surprised that a Grinnell merchant would go to these lengths to find someone and reconnect them with their belonging – it’s just what people do in that community.”

Today there seems to be a growing chasm between consumers’ trusts and the business organizations they depend upon. Polls shows that only 4 percent of U.S. adults say they trust their HMO; 7 percent their health insurer; 11 percent, their life insurer; 12 percent their telco. Seventy-four percent say corporate America’s reputation is “not good” or “terrible.”

What is your organization doing to help restore and build consumer trust?

As the economy continues to sputter, many marketers are dealing with shrinking advertising budgets by leveraging performance-based advertising initiatives to help generate qualified sales leads. Pay-For-Call (PFC) is a performance-based advertising medium that delivers customer inquiries to advertisers via the telephone. PFC programs also help marketers reduce risk through greater accountability and measurement since advertisers only pay for leads that meet a minimum call duration.

Local service based businesses, including; automotive repair, plumbing, roofing and pest control are just a few that are most likely to benefit from PFC programs. The trick, in the above examples, is to match the service category with the prospect’s shopping research behavior. You want prospects to consider your company as a possible choice when they’re experiencing an event that requires the immediate use of your service category. Because print yellow page users tend to align their searches around life-events …

My sink is leaking … I need a plumber now!

the phone directory is remarkably well suited for pay-for-call. Of course, other advertising distribution channels, such as Internet yellow pages, search engines and mobile marketing can be used to launch PFC initiatives.

PFC marketing initiatives are not necessarily silver bullets for shrinking marketing budgets. You’ll still need to work closely with your PFC provider to agree on the metrics that qualify an incoming call as a lead, as well as the cost for that lead. However; given the current economic climate it’s a marketing program worth exploring.